Visible or Invisible · Resource 05 · Chapter 18

Sprint-to-Scale Execution Architecture

Bound the pilot. Test the evidence. Stabilize the workflow. Expand one dimension at a time.

Fill in the fields, then print your answers or choose Save as PDF in the print dialog. Save on this browser keeps a copy on this device; it does not sync with other devices. This worksheet does not submit your answers to us.

Ready to begin. You can also print a blank copy for a team session.

01 / Bound the Pilot

Choose one workflow and a small working group of four to six people who handle the real handoffs.

Workflow, product family, and pilot boundaries

Customer or business outcome

Working group and user group

Workflow owner, source owner, quality owner, and sponsor

Baseline: cycle time, errors / rework, stalls, and escalations

Review date and evidence to collect

02 / Design the Controlled Test

Classify the work as Automate, Assist, or Protect. Keep human accountability explicit wherever technical risk or customer trust is involved.

Current flow → proposed flow

Automate: repeatable steps, rules, and exceptions

Assist: what AI prepares and who validates it

Protect: decisions requiring human judgment and sign-off

Approved sources, data boundaries, and approved environment

Review cadence, escalation rule, human override, and working playbook

03 / Apply the Evidence Gate

Review actual use and results together. All five conditions must hold before the team considers expansion. A date or a score cannot approve the decision.

1. Usage

People use the workflow in live work.

Evidence check: usageObserved evidence and source

2. Quality

Outputs are reliable enough with the agreed review.

Evidence check: qualityObserved evidence and source

3. Speed

Cycle time improves without weakening quality.

Evidence check: speedObserved evidence and source

4. Ownership

Named owners run the correction loop.

Evidence check: ownershipObserved evidence and source

5. Security and governance

Data boundaries, approved environments, escalation, and sign-off work in practice.

Evidence check: security and governanceObserved evidence and source

Gate review

04 / Stabilize and Retest

A failed condition means hold expansion, correct the problem, and test again with the original group.

Gate decision: hold, correct and retest, or proceed to a bounded expansion; include rationale and approver

Correction log: what failed, what changed, and what improved

Source gaps, handoffs, overrides, and playbook updates to complete

Correction owner, authority, and time allocated

Retest date and evidence required to close each failed or unverified condition

Where will any measured released capacity go?

05 / Expand One Dimension

Add one user group, product family, or use case at a time, only after repeatable behavior and a working correction process are demonstrated.

The one dimension we will expand, and what stays bounded

Engineering confidence: baseline → observed result → next review

Procurement confidence: sourcing, lifecycle, availability, and supporting evidence

Commercial execution: baseline → observed result → next review

Standing owners, source boundaries, review cadence, escalation, and sign-off

Stop / rollback conditions, next review, and lessons to share